Eight popular dual-cab 4×4 utilities go under the microscope to find out which one represents the best buying for Australian new car shoppers.
Sections in this Megatest:
- Why are we doing this?
- Which cars have we included in our 2022 4WD Ute Megatest?
- How we tested Australia’s most popular dual-cab utes
- Part 1: Ownership Costs
- Part 2 & 3: Equipment and Space
- Part 4: Infotainment
- Part 5: Safety
- Part 6: Driving
- Verdict: What is Australia’s Best Dual-Cab Ute in 2022?
This is a comparison between eight of Australia’s most popular and sought-after four-wheel-drive utes. This includes the Toyota HiLux, Ford Ranger, Mazda BT-50, Isuzu D-Max, Mitsubishi Triton, GWM Ute Cannon X, SsangYong Musso and Nissan Navara.
Why are we doing this?
When it’s not medium-sized SUVs that Australians are buying by the roll-on, roll-off boatload, then it’s four-wheel-drive utes.
And if you want to read about our recent best-value medium-sized SUV Megatest – where we compare the best under a budget of $40,000 – then follow this link.
Four-wheel-drive utes make up the second most popular segment in the Australian motoring landscape, and it is one that has evolved dramatically over the past decade into something that is prestigious, pricey and bristling with technology.
It’s also a segment that is more refined and gentrified than ever. Along with the important metrics of off-road ability, payload and towing capability, the increased levels of decorum and comfort see many use the modern-day four-wheel-drive ute as a true jack-of-all-trades that can handle family, work and adventure duties all in its stride.
So far in 2022, the four-wheel-drive ute is dominated by the usual suspects: the Toyota HiLux, Ford Ranger, Mitsubishi Triton and Isuzu D-Max.
We are missing the Volkswagen Amarok and LDV T60 because each brand declined to offer a vehicle on the grounds that they will be soon updated; the former with an entirely new generation, the latter likely to be a more minor model-year change.
Also off the list are larger North American pick-up trucks like the Ram 1500 and Chevrolet Silverado, and the relatively niche Jeep Gladiator (with its petrol V6) and Mahinda Pik-Up (targeted more as a budget workhorse, rather than a family crossover dual-cab).
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Which cars have we included in our 2022 4WD Ute Megatest?
With the focus of this Megatest on dual-cabs as de facto family haulers, we’ve opted for those utes in the segment that best reflect this ‘lifestyle’ choice that Australians are increasingly making.
The big guns from Ford, Toyota, Nissan, Isuzu, Mazda and Mitsubishi faced some competition from challenger brands GWM and SsangYong.
All brands offer dual-cabs in their respective ranges that lean towards family-friendliness, filled with enough refinement to ensure comfort and convenience, while underneath remaining true to their rugged roots.
As the newest kid in the sandpit, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak best embodies this philosophy, blending performance and comfort in a package that looks both stylish and capable.
The Toyota HiLux might be getting a bit long in the tooth, but that hasn’t deterred buyers, the venerable workhorse remaining Australia’s best-selling vehicle of any kind this year. And in SR5 specification, the HiLux caters to a buyer who wants more from their dual-cab than just utility and off-road ability.
It’s a similar story with the Nissan Navara Pro-4X and the 2022 Drive Car of the Year – Best Dual-Cab twins, Isuzu D-Max and Mazda BT-50 SP, while the Mitsubishi Triton in GSR trim, dressed in its Sunday best, continues to make a play for the value-conscious buyer amongst its competitive set of mainstream manufacturers.
But with new competition from challenger brands, the concept of value in the dual-cab segment has shifted. Both the SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate from South Korea and China’s GWM Ute Cannon X are fitted with the level of equipment expected by buyers at this end of the segment.
And tellingly, both undercut their rivals from the established brands, and by a significant margin, meaning the budget-conscious now have meaningful options in the ‘lifestyle’ ute segment.
Value, of course, is paramount, and more so when the price range for our eight finalists stretches from a low of $43,590 drive-away to a high of $73,281. That’s a not insignificant gap, and whether that $30K difference between the most expensive to the most affordable can be justified is just one key area we investigated.
[ Back to the top of the page ]
How we tested Australia’s most popular dual-cab utes
Our panel of five expert judges evaluated each of the eight dual-cabs in this Megatest against six key criteria: Ownership Costs, Interior Space and Tray Dimensions, Equipment, Safety, Infotainment, and Driving.
With each category having between 12 and 23 criteria, our testing comprised over 100 data points on which to base our assessment.
We ran the calculator over ownership costs, taking in not just drive-away pricing, fuel use, insurance quotes, servicing costs and warranty coverage, but also evaluating potential resale value.
Where a test vehicle came with extra-cost options – such as the Ford Ranger’s premium B&O sound system and matrix LED headlights – we excluded these options from our scoring and took them off the price.
We checked every dual-cab against a 23-point list of basic equipment that we believe every dual-cab ute should be fitted with as standard but sometimes isn’t. Things like tub liners and a full-size spare wheel and tyre are, in our opinion, invaluable when it comes to the dual-cab segment.
But as this test focuses on utes as the family chariot of choice, we also delved deep into the list of creature comforts not always associated with utes. Things like leather seats, seat heating and climate control, along with air vents in the second row, were assessed across every one of our eight combatants.
We also ran the tape measure over not just each ute’s respective tubs – and the disparity from smallest to largest is significant – but also the interiors, measuring everything from elbow room for front and rear occupants, as well as knee and head room across both rows.
We swiped, prodded and touched the various infotainment set-ups. From ease of usability to embedded features and charging capabilities, we learned not all systems are created equally.
Safety, of course, is a key measurement. With technologies advancing at a rapid rate, we ran the safety cap over the range to see which dual-cabs are keeping pace with those advancements and which are starting to lag behind.
We did not tow with any of our test cars, that metric likely to be the subject of a future Megatest. Similarly, we did not take out challengers off-road, reasoning that these ‘lifestyle-focussed’ dual-cabs are far less likely to venture off the beaten track than some of their more off-road-focussed siblings.
If you’re curious about how these utes go off the beaten track, check out our 2021 Off-road Megatest.
We did, however, evaluate each dual-cab’s driving experience over a test loop that encompassed a wide range of conditions. From chopped-up back roads to suburban streets and a stretch of motorway, the varying surfaces, speeds and conditions provided a perfect canvas to evaluate each ute’s on-road performance.
At the end of our exhaustive testing, we gave every dual-cab a rank in every category from first to eighth. We added those rankings together and applied a weighting to more important categories like Ownership Costs, Safety, Payload and Towing, and Equipment.
Only Drive.com.au goes to these lengths when testing the vehicles more Australians buy, providing you with the most in-depth and informative info when making your next new car purchase decision.
We’ve listed all the data below, and all the rankings, so you can see how each vehicle performed in every category. Understanding that different buyers may prioritise different vehicle aspects, as well as declaring an overall winner, we’ve provided each segment rank if you’re in search of a dual-cab ute with the best cabin space, best ownership costs, best safety, etc.
Let’s find out which car represents Australia’s best family-friendly dual-cab ute.
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Part 1: Ownership Costs
It’s often forgotten that the final cost of your car doesn’t just end at the drive-away purchase price. There are a whole host of ownership costs you’ll have to pay after the fact too – and these are particularly pertinent now in 2022, where everything seems to cost more money.
On this Megatest, we dived into the overall cost of owning a dual-cab ute, including things like purchase price, warranty, insurance, fuel use, and servicing – key costs that become really important considerations for new car buyers.
Our research on this Megatest found there are widely variable costs in what you’ll pay in each of these areas.
For example, while they’re some of the most affordable cars on test, the Chinese GWM Ute and Korean Ssangyong Musso have some of the best warranties in the segment. Conversely, what you’ll lose in resale is substantially worse than Japanese brand rivals such as Toyota, Nissan, and Mitsubishi.
To further explain how we generated our data, we also opted to compare drive-away prices based on a buyer in Sydney, 2000. We looked at both how long you’re warranted for, and how far you’ll be covered, with regards to after-sales care. Servicing costs were judged against a 45,000km mileage, typical over a three-year ownership period.
Resale value, too, is arguably one of the most glossed-over areas of car ownership, but will really impact changeover cost when it comes time for the next new car. We calculated the overall cost of owning each of these models over three years – including drop in resale value – to see which one is the most expensive.
Whole-of-life costs aren’t always front of mind for dual-cab ute buyers, which is why we’ve outlined what you’ll pay in these key areas over the course of three years.
*All prices are accurate as of testing completed in September 2022.
| OWNERSHIP COSTS | Ford Ranger Wildtrak | GWM Ute Cannon X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate | Toyota HiLux SR5 |
| Drive-away price | $73,281 | $45,490 | $72,944 | $72,509 | $58,490 | $66,310 | $43,590 | $66,201 |
| Test car drive-away w/ options | $75,522 | $45,490 | $73,594 | $74,759 | $65,997 | $47,685 | $69,472 | |
| Warranty years | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Warranty KM | Unlimited | Unlimited | 150,000 | Unlimited | 200,000 | Unlimited | Unlimited | 200,000 |
| Roadside assist | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 0 |
| Service costs three years |
$987 | $1700 | $1467 | $1551 | $1397 | $1754 | $1125 | $1300 |
| Resale % after 3 years | 89.2 | 68.6 | 81.6 | 80.8 | 83.1 | 84.7 | 71.1 | 97.1 |
| Lost value after 3 years | $7914 | $14,284 | $13,422 | $13,922 | $9885 | $10,145 | $12,598 | $1920 |
| Fuel use claimed (L/100km) | 7.6 | 9.4 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.6 | 7.9 | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Fuel use on test L/100km | 8.9 | 10.4 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 9.1 |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Insurance quote | $1535 | $1586 | $1747 | $1650 | $1282 | $1581 | $1318 | $1398 |
| Cost over three years | $15,509 | $23,550 | $22,371 | $22,691 | $17,720 | $19,099 | $20,323 | $9871 |
| RANK | 1 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
*All prices are correct as of July 2022.
8. GWM Ute Cannon X
- Performs well on initial purchase price
- Has an equal-best warranty offering
- Let down in servicing costs, where it was second most expensive
- Resale value is poor compared to competitors
- Fuel use is noticeably worse, both claimed consumption as well as as-tested
7. Mazda BT-50 SP
- One of the most expensive utes in the comparison
- As-tested fuel consumption performs closely to claimed target
- Insurance cost is expensive compared to rivals
- 80 per cent retained value after three years is only better than SsangYong and GWM
- Three-year servicing costs are more expensive than mechanically identical Isuzu D-Max
=5. Isuzu D-Max
- Most expensive ute to insure on this Megatest
- Second most expensive ute outright on initial purchase price
- Isuzu often delivers drive-away specials, which is worth noting
- Strong six-year warranty but limited to 150,000km
- As-tested fuel use very close to Isuzu’s claim
=5. Nissan Navara
- Five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty common for the segment
- Servicing costs are the most expensive of the Megatest
- Resale performance is among the best of the comparison
- Actual fuel use is one litre higher than claim per 100km
4. Mitsubishi Triton
- Traditionally an affordable ute option but is outshined in 2022 by GWM and SsangYong
- Longest warranty of all, though comes with the caveat that servicing is completed by Mitsubishi
- Four years of roadside assistance is below average
- One of the thirstier models on test with 9.6L/100km rating on-test
- Insurance is cheap compared to rivals
3. Toyota HiLux
- Traditionally a strong aftersales value player, the HiLux performs strongly across our criteria
- Servicing costs are affordable compared to rivals over three years
- Resale value is incredibly strong after three years standing at 97 per cent
- Three-year cost is the best in the Megatest thanks to strong resale value
- Misses out on any complimentary roadside assistance
2. SsangYong Musso
- Most affordable dual-cab ute in this Megatest, despite adding the XLV longer tray option
- Generous seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty is above average
- Servicing costs are remarkably cheap over three years, beaten only by the Ford
- Resale performance is the brand’s downfall, standing at just over 70 per cent
- As-tested fuel use is second worst of the comparison
- Second most affordable insurance quote
1. Ford Ranger
- Most expensive car outright, but beats out all other options in terms of ownership value
- Equal-best offering of seven years’ roadside assistance
- Three-year servicing costs are most affordable on the Megatest, under $1000
- Strong resale performance sees nearly 90 per cent retained value after three years
- Third most frugal on fuel use
- Cost of ownership over three years is second only to the Toyota HiLux
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Part 2: Driving
The once humble four-wheel-drive ute is getting pulled in many directions these days. While some deride and dismiss this kind of vehicle for being crude and rough-riding, the ute has to keep a lot of plates spinning in its remit. Along with maintaining a healthy payload and high towing capacity, buyers are also demanding that the modern-day four-wheel drive is refined and comfortable: enjoyable to drive with good bump absorption and noise insulation.
And while many no doubt use their own utes mainly for the hard work and rough-and-tumble, there are plenty of examples that parade around town with only friends and family weighing them down.
This element of a ute’s character – which has never been more important – is what we are putting under the microscope in this Megatest.
Of course, things like payload, off-road ability and towing capacity are all very important as well. You can read about those things in our many reviews on Drive.com.au, and you can also dig into the nitty-gritty of our recent Off-road Megatest.
There is a lot that these utes share in common in this comparison: turbo-diesel engines, automatic transmissions and similar overall dimensions. Most have leaf-sprung rear suspension, while only two (Musso and Navara) use coil springs. Rear drum brakes are more common than discs still, and most of these utes have a more rudimentary part-time four-wheel drive system.
In this test, it’s more than just engine performance. That’s one important metric, but others include driver comfort and ergonomics, ride quality, visibility and steering.
| DRIVING | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.0TT | GWM Ute Cannon X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate | Toyota Hilux SR5 |
| 3=perfect, 1.5=avg, <1.5=sub-par | Score | Score | Score | Score | Score | Score | Score | Score |
| Driving position | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Seat comfort | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Ergonomics | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Vision | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Noise levels | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Engine | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| Transmission | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Steering | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Brakes | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Ride quality | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Vehicle dynamics | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Manoeuvrability | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Driver assist sys. effectiveness | 2 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 |
| TOTAL | 23.5 | 17.5 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 18 | 20.5 | 18 | 23 |
8. GWM Ute Cannon X
- Engine performs better than 120kW/400Nm specs (lowest in comparison) suggest, but the driving experience is let down by peaky and jerky throttle tuning
- The gearbox is also calibrated imperfectly, choosing to shift (and not shift) at strange times
- Ride quality was also towards the bottom of the pack, feeling more firm and jittery over rough surfaces than other utes
- In our test drives, we picked up on more false positives from the driver assistance systems than other utes
- Steering feels well weighted and suitable for the vehicle
- Noise levels and ergonomics on par with the average for the class
=6. Mitsubishi Triton GSR
- Ride quality feels firm and jittery on rough surfaces, and betrays the age of the Triton’s platform
- Seat comfort not as good as other utes, lacking good underthigh support and bolstering
- Ergonomically behind the pace, lacking some adjustments to driver’s position
- Vehicle dynamics not as well polished as other utes in the segment
- Still got hydraulic-assisted steering, but feels well-weighted and balanced
- Mitsubishi’s MIVEC diesel is only rattly when working hard, and torquier/more flexible than the figures suggest
- Slightly shorter wheelbase yields a tighter turning circle
=6. SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate
- Powertrain proved to be fairly refined and smooth, offering enough punch for application
- Some parts of the active safety technology proved to peeve during our test loops
- Locally developed suspension – with more of a heavy-duty bent – loses some of the suppleness of the Musso without this set-up
- Rexton wagon-derived chassis steers nicely for a ute, and makes it easy to drive
- Smooth gearbox performed well, with only rare strange decisions
- Driving position, ergonomics and visibility all on par for the segment
5. Nissan Navara Pro-4X
- Falls down on important metrics of ergonomics and seat adjustment. Missing reach adjustment, and seating position feels relatively high
- Driver’s seat lacking underthigh adjustment and support
- 2.3-litre diesel engine feels torquey and responsive up to highway speeds, only starts to get breathless under load at high speeds
- Driving experience is one of the more car-like ones for the segment, with good steering and nice handling characteristics
- Seven-speed gearbox is a good operator around town
=3. Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain
- Classic torquey diesel engine not the fastest, but feels unstressed and unfazed
- New 4JJ3 engine a big improvement in refinement over the previous generation
- Electrically assisted steering feels light and easy at low speeds, but adds weight nicely as pace increases
- Ride quality and comfort sit towards the top of the pack
- Active safety equipment can be a little bit noisy, but is adjustable
- Comfortable seats and driving position
=3. Mazda BT-50 SP
- 3.0-litre engine uses capacity for natural, lazy torque for easy progress
- Engine performance overall good, and handled well by the smooth six-speed automatic gearbox
- Ride quality is good with nice bump absorption on offer
- Steering well weighted, lots of electric assistance at low speeds
- Ergonomics, seat and steering wheel adjustment all good
2. Toyota HiLux SR5
- Engine/powertrain feels the punchiest and brawniest in this field of entrants
- Ride quality good for segment, improved steadily over the years through tuning
- Comfortable seats, good driving position and adjustment on offer
- Six-speed automatic gearbox didn’t put a foot wrong
- Steering feels heavy at low speeds and stopped, but feels nicely weighted at speed
1. Ford Ranger Wildtrak
- Seats are comfortable and nicely bolstered, but miss out on adjustable underthigh support
- Powertrain is smooth, torquey and flexible despite being only 2.0 litres in capacity
- 10-speed automatic gearbox is improved in the new Ranger, more direct feeling and more decisive
- Driver assistance systems not intrusive during everyday driving
- Ride quality is good for the segment
- Steering nicely tuned, dynamics also high for the segment
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Part 4: Safety
While utes have previously been viewed as utilitarian workhorses designed for load-carrying and tackling tricky terrain, they are increasingly becoming a go-to option for families with varied needs.
As a result, the demand for up-to-date safety technology in the segment has never been higher, with ever-evolving ANCAP criteria and testing methods placing fresh pressure on manufacturers to equip their utes with the same capabilities as their passenger cars.
In lieu of our ability to conduct proper crash testing of our dual-cab ute Megatest contestants (for obvious reasons), we assessed their safety credentials across 17 key criteria.
These included the presence of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems – and the extent to which these systems could detect vulnerable road users and function at intersections and in reverse – as well as the presence of lane-keeping, blind-spot monitoring, tyre pressure monitoring and speed-limit detection systems.
We also scored utes not only on whether they received a five-star rating from independent assessor ANCAP, but also on when this score was issued, given ANCAP testing criteria grow more stringent every two to three years.
What became clear is that ute safety is still catching up to passenger car safety, with several features typically found on passenger cars not yet commonplace across the dual-cab segment. However, the more recently the model was updated, the more likely it was to offer active safety features over and above the minimum requirements.
Even on some top-spec utes – including the Triton, Navara and Musso – you’ll miss out on active cruise control, with only a basic non-adaptive cruise control set-up offered. Other safety systems that aren’t yet guaranteed across the segment include tyre pressure monitoring, driver attention alert, blind-spot camera, safe exit warning, and intelligent speed limit assist.
Notably, there’s also not really any reverse AEB in the segment – the only car to offer it is the Ford Ranger. However, plenty of cars feature surround-view cameras and front and rear parking sensors – in fact, the Nissan Navara is the only car not to feature front parking sensors in addition to rear parking sensors.
While we didn’t score based on airbags, it’s still an important metric to mention. At a minimum, most utes in the segment have seven airbags as standard. The new Ranger, however, has nine airbags, while the D-Max and BT-50 each have eight. The Musso has the fewest number of airbags with only six.
All of our utes bar one received five-star ratings from ANCAP, albeit from different years. The SsangYong Musso was the only model not yet tested by ANCAP and had two points deducted as a result. Meanwhile, the cars with the most recent five-star ANCAP ratings were the Ford Ranger, which was tested in 2022, the GWM Ute, tested in 2021, and the Isuzu D-Max and BT-50, both tested in 2020.
| SAFETY | Ford Ranger Wildtrak | GWM Ute Cannon-X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV | Toyota HiLux SR5 |
| ESC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ABS | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| AEB | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Blind-spot warning | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Blind-spot camera | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rear cross-traffic alert | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Lane-departure warning | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Radar cruise control | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tyre pressure monitor system | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Speed limit aware | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Intelligent speed limit assist | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parking cameras | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 |
| Parking sensors | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
| Driver fatigue alert | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Safe exit warning | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ANCAP year/rating | 2022/5 stars | 2021/5 stars | 2020/5 stars | 2020/5 stars | 2015/5 stars | 2015/5 stars | Untested | 2019/5 stars |
| ANCAP adjusted score | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| TOTAL | 27 | 24 | 22 | 22 | 12.5 | 16.5 | 16 | 14.5 |
| RANKING | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8. Mitsubishi Triton
- One of the oldest models on our test, set to gain a new generation in 2023
- Missing some modern safety tech included on other models, like tyre-pressure monitoring, speed-limit awareness and driver attention monitoring
- Cruise control, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-departure warning and blind-spot warning do not offer active intervention
- AEB system can detect pedestrians but not cyclists, and cannot function in reverse
- Has a multi-around-view monitor for parking, front and rear sensors, and a misacceleration mitigation system, which reduces the chance of the car hitting an obstacle if the driver mistakenly hits the accelerator at low speeds
- Seven airbags
- Last tested by ANCAP in 2015 when it received five stars
7. Toyota HiLux
- Some safety omissions will be remedied with the arrival of an updated HiLux in late 2022, i.e. confirmed to gain a rear cross-traffic alert, 360-degree camera, and blind-spot monitoring from SR5 grade and up
- No intelligent speed limiter, reverse AEB or tyre pressure monitoring
- As standard it receives front and rear parking sensors, AEB with pedestrian and daytime cyclist detection, traffic-sign recognition, lane-departure alert with active intervention, active cruise control with high-speed capabilities
- Seven airbags
- Last tested by ANCAP in 2019 and received five stars
6. SssangYong Musso
- Was last updated in 2022 and remains the only ute in our test to not have been tested by ANCAP
- Won points for featuring a 360-degree camera, a tyre pressure monitoring system, a driver attention warning, and front and rear sensors
- Blind-spot monitoring, lane-keep and cruise-control systems are not active – offering only warnings with no intervention
- No reverse AEB, traffic sign recognition or speed-limit warning
- Six airbags
5. Nissan Navara
- Last tested by ANCAP in 2015 when it received five stars
- Scored well despite being well into its life cycle thanks to an around-view monitor, driver monitoring system, a rear cross-traffic alert, intelligent lane-keeping and blind-spot intervention, and a tyre pressure monitoring system
- Notable omissions include no active cruise control (only basic cruise control available), no reverse AEB, and no front parking sensors
- Seven airbags
=3: Mazda BT-50 and Isuzu D-Max
- Twins under the skin received exact same scores because they share the same platform and equipment
- AEB system with functionality second only to the Ranger’s, with pedestrian and cyclist detection and junction assist, but no reverse AEB
- Both models miss out on a tyre pressure monitoring system
- Two of only three cars to only offer a reverse camera (the third was the Toyota HiLux) in lieu of a 360-degree camera
- Both include a rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear sensors, driver attention monitoring, traffic sign recognition, active lane-keeping systems, and adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go
- They received five-star ratings from ANCAP when they arrived in 2020
- Both have eight airbags each
2. GWM Ute Cannon X
- The only ute to offer a safe exit warning (also known as a door open warning), which alerts occupants to approaching hazards before opening the car’s doors
- Misses out on driver attention monitoring and a rear cross-traffic alert
- AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists but is unable to function in reverse
- Features include traffic sign recognition, an intelligent speed limiter, active lane-keeping assist, a tyre pressure monitoring system, a 360-degree camera, and front and rear parking sensors
- Has a recent five-star ANCAP rating from 2021
- Seven airbags
1. Ford Ranger
- The newest ute on our test
- AEB system was the most comprehensive –able to detect pedestrians and cyclists, and function at intersections and in reverse
- Boasts a 360-degree camera, intelligent speed limiter, traffic sign recognition, rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control, lane-departure alert and blind-spot monitoring – all with active intervention
- Blind-spot monitoring system can also account for a trailer if required
- The only model in our test to offer reverse AEB
- Received a five-star rating from ANCAP after being tested in 2022 – the most recent ANCAP rating in our test
- Nine airbags
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Part 5: Equipment & Space
One of the main draws of a dual-cab ute is the fact they’re so adaptable to different circumstances. Whether it’s for work or for play, these utes are favoured for their go-anywhere abilities, load-carrying capacities, and well-equipped interiors that provide just about all you could want in a new car purchase.
But key to the dual-cab ute is its ability to be used for everyday life. Stands to reason, then, space is an important factor. Whether it’s the load-carrying ability or how much space your passengers will have inside the cabin, the size of a dual-cab ute could be a make-or-break factor in whether it’s the right option for your use case.
As part of our Ute Megatest, Drive looked at all kinds of dimensions relating to both interior space as well as tub capacity. We broke out the tape measure to assess the dimensions of each competitor. This included elbow width, knee room and head room in the front and rear of the cabin, plus tray measurements including tub length, width and height, along with the tailgate loading height.
Measurements were taken from the same points on all utes for ultimate uniformity.
| INTERIOR SPACE | Ford Ranger Wildtrak | GWM Ute Cannon X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate | Toyota HiLux SR5 |
| Elbow width front (mm) | 1543 | 1512 | 1498 | 1505 | 1466 | 1492 | 1595 | 1479 |
| Elbow width rear (mm) | 1512 | 1458 | 1465 | 1468 | 1455 | 1468 | 1576 | 1460 |
| Knee room min (mm) | 149 | 160 | 159 | 151 | 160 | 150 | 154 | 145 |
| Knee room max (mm) | 401 | 395 | 382 | 389 | 370 | 380 | 395 | 386 |
| Head room front (mm) | 1032 | 1010 | 1012 | 1015 | 1005 | 1010 | 1029 | 998 |
| Head room rear (mm) | 972 | 950 | 936 | 935 | 952 | 945 | 956 | 925 |
| RANK | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
Equipment is another big consideration point, especially seeing as we have mostly high-specification-grade models. Gone are the days of a few splashes of faux leather and a funky name, better examples of a four-wheel drive can truly feel like a more premium experience in the cabin.
Newer entrants to the segment scored better in this department, and some more expensive models were beaten by one of the cheapest in the Megatest.
Among some more usual features like push-button start, climate control and rain-sensing wipers, we are seeing an influx of even more technology these days: wireless charging pads, roller covers, and additional power outlets. The better examples don’t spurn practicality, either. Elements like locking tailgates, additional tie-down points, and auxiliary storage also scored points.
| EQUIPMENT | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.0TT | GWM Ute Cannon X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate | Toyota Hilux SR5 |
| Push-button start | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Tilt & reach steering adjust | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
| Auto headlights | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rain-sensing wipers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Climate control | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Electric front seats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Heated/vented front seats | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Leather upholstery | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Wireless charging mat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tub power outlet | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| tub liner | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Tub tie downs (0.25 per tie down) | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 |
| Door bottle holders (0.25 per holder) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rear air vents | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Extra interior storage | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Folddown armrest (rear) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Cup holder count (0.25 per cup holder) | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Underbonnet Battery space | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tonneau Cover (roller +1, electric +1) | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Locking tailgate (central locking +1) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Locking rear differential | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Spare tyre (F/S 1, SS 0.5) |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TOTAL | 27.5 | 17.5 | 19 | 19 | 17.5 | 17 | 18 | 18 |
| TUB SPACE | Ford Ranger Wildtrak | GWM Ute Cannon X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate | Toyota HiLux SR5 |
| Tub width between wheel arches (mm) | 1200 | 1146 | 1105 | 1105 | 1065 | 1125 | 1140 | 1105 |
| Tub width maximum (mm) | 1528 | 1614 | 1465 | 1455 | 1533 | 1548 | 1612 | 1645 |
| Tub length (mm) | 1480 | 1561 | 1460 | 1460 | 1400 | 1505 | 1625 | 1570 |
| Tub height (mm) | 533 | 563 | 522 | 522 | 505 | 525 | 578 | 495 |
| Luggage load height (mm) | 865 | 849 | 835 | 820 | 887 | 865 | 835 | 880 |
| Tonneau useability rating (1 to 5) | 4.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| RANK | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
Interior Space
8. Toyota HiLux SR5
- Is the least spacious in three areas including rear head room, front head room, and minimum knee room
- The HiLux was disappointingly small in relation to elbow width
- It scored mid-pack for maximum leg room
- Optional premium pack helps the HiLux in this company
- One of the few utes with additional cup holders inside
7. Mitsubishi Triton GSR
- The Mitsubishi Triton contained the least space for elbow width, both front and rear
- It also contained the least amount of leg room of all
- Head room is good in the rear, but poor in the front for driver and passenger
- Will decently well equipped, the interior is feeling it’s age
6. Nissan Navara Pro-4X
- Nissan’s Navara isn’t particularly spacious inside with poor elbow width for front-row occupants
- It gets better in the rear in terms of available space, but leg room is still among the worst
- Head room is roughly mid-pack for the Megatest, scoring 5 of 8 cars tested
- Manual seats missing heating (and some adjustment)
5. Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain
- Fifth place sees the Isuzu D-Max score mid-pack in just about all measurements
- Head room at the rear and maximum leg room are its downfalls
- However, it scores well for head room up front, and for leg room with the front seat raked back
- Beats the twin Mazda with additional cup holders, and now has heated seats
4. Mazda BT-50 SP
- With such close ties to the Isuzu, the BT-50’s measurements are close but not identical
- Subtle differences in trims see the BT-50 edge ahead
- The Mazda BT-50 is marginally more spacious overall, but there’s a minute amount of difference
- Different colour interior trim helps to heighten the experience
3. GWM Ute Cannon X
- Chinese challenger brands tend to offer value in terms of space, and the GWM puts in a strong showing
- It contains some of the best leg room on the Megatest, and its wide cabin allows for good elbow width
- Head room measurements stand mid-pack
- One of two utes on test with a wireless charging pad
2. Ford Ranger
- The Ford Ranger is the most spacious for head room thanks to low, scalloped seats
- The width of the cabin is also among the best on test
- Leg room is the best when the front seat is raked forward, but becomes the worst when it’s brought all the way back
- Most comprehensive array of standard equipment in Wildtrak specification
1. SsangYong Musso
- With some of the largest exterior dimensions on test, it’s little wonder the Musso’s cabin is the biggest
- It is the widest ute for elbow room, and scores well for both head room and leg room
- Front seats manually adjustable, but only example on test with ventilation
- Also one of the few with a central-locking tailgate
Tub Dimensions
8. Mitsubishi Triton GLS
- Mitsubishi’s enduring Triton has fallen behind when it comes to its tub size
- The tray is the narrowest, shortest, and has the highest loading height of the bunch
- It also ranked poorly in relation to tub height
7. Toyota HiLux SR5
- A car also left behind compared to newer rivals is the Toyota Hilux
- Its tub is the lowest of all on test meaning you can’t fit as much in
- It’s also one of the few cars on the Megatest without a tub-liner or tonneau
=5. Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain/Mazda BT-50 SP
- Shared development sees these two tubs score on an even keel
- Nearly all measurements are identical, though maximum tub width is one centimetre wider in the Isuzu
- Conversely, tailgate load height is 1.5cm lower in the Mazda compared to the Isuzu
4. Nissan Navara Pro-4X
- The Navara scores fourth overall and appears mid-pack in just about all tub measurements
- The only area where the Navara scored worse than 4th is tailgate load height, where it was 5th
3. Ford Ranger
- There is the most amount of space between the wheel arches of the Ford Ranger
- Unfortunately there is some of the worst space width-wise, outside of the arches
- A remote-operated roller shutter, light tailgate, and tub step makes useability simple
- The Ranger also stocks a high tub height for enhanced load capacity
2. GWM Ute Cannon X
- The GWM has one of the widest tubs on the test
- It’s also very tall to allow for maximum stacking of items
- The tray is the third longest, while the tailgate incorporates a built-in ladder for easy access
1. SsangYong Musso
- With some of the largest dimensions on test the Musso outscores all others in the tub comparison stakes
- It is the tallest and longest tub outright, and places will in load height and width.
- Unfortunately it doesn’t come standard with a tonneau cover
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Part 6: Infotainment
For too long, dual-cab owners were treated as second-class citizens when it came to infotainment, the screens often small while functionality remained limited.
But, with the popularity of dual-cab utes as a de facto family hauler on the rise, the advent of the ‘lifestyle’ ute has seen a seismic shift in terms of the technology on offer.
From large, portrait-style displays that provide the same functionality as found in traditional passenger cars, to wireless connectivity and charging, digital radio and satellite navigation included as standard, the dual-cab ute of today is a different breed to those of yesteryear.
But not all makers of dual-cabs have received the memo, and nothing highlights this more than lining up eight of the most popular ‘lifestyle-focussed’ models and testing the vast array of infotainment systems on offer.
We swiped and we pinched, we tethered and we paired, we charged and we set our destination to the heart of the sun, or at least to the wild west of outer Sydney, to determine how each dual-cab stacks up when it comes to keeping you connected and entertained on the road.
Here, from worst to best, is how they rank.
8. Mitsubishi Triton GSR
- At a measly 7.0 inches, the Triton offered the smallest screen of all the contenders. We’ve seen bigger smartphones
- Not only is the screen tiny in comparison to its rivals, its graphics are a generation old with clunky fonts and clunkier menu items
- Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, although you’ll need cables to connect, Mitsubishi not offering wireless connectivity in its now ageing dual-cab
- That small screen also impacts on rear-view camera quality, the images not only small but grainy as well
- Claws back some points with three USB points (two in the front and one in the rear) as well as two 12V plugs for extra charging capabilities
| INFOTAINMENT | Ford Ranger Wildtrak | GWM Ute Cannon X | Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain | Mazda BT-50 SP | Mitsubishi Triton GSR | Nissan Navara Pro-4X | SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate | Toyota HiLux SR5 |
| Touchscreen | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wired Apple CarPlay/Android Auto | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Satellite navigation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Detailed trip computer | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 |
| Digital radio | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Digital manual | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| TFT/animated cluster | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Head-up display | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parking cameras (0.5pt each) | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Camera quality | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| USB front (0.5pt each) | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 |
| USB rear (05.pt each) | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| 220V plug | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 12V plug (0.5pt each) | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
| Remote/app access | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Voice access | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ease of use | 2.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Main screen size | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 |
| Graphics quality | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 |
| TOTAL POINTS | 24 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 9 | 15 | 14.5 | 14 |
| RANK | 1 | =6 | =2 | =2 | 8 | =2 | 5 | =6 |
=6. GWM Ute Cannon X
- The GWM’s big 9.0-inch touchscreen impresses with its size and the rich clarity of its graphical interface
- But it lacks satellite navigation and digital radio, while Apple CarPlay and Android Auto require a cable to connect
- Despite the sharp screen resolution, the camera quality is a bit sketchy, with grainy images that don’t inspire confidence when reversing
- A total of four USB points is a plus, as is the lone 12V plug and a single 220V outlet, one of only two utes in this set equipped with that feature. The USB points are helpfully backlit, making it easy to plug-and-play at night
- A lack of shortcut buttons means you’ll be swiping through screens, menus and sub-menus to effect any meaningful change
- The impressive-looking digital driver’s display offers no configurability, a static and classic case of style over substance
=6. Toyota HiLux SR5
- An 8.0-inch touchscreen works as intended with responsive inputs and easy connectivity to Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
- Satellite navigation and digital radio are standard, and while the GPS mapping looks decidedly old school, it works well enough
- Shortcut buttons make for light work of wading through menus
- The HiLux loses points for having only a single USB port in the front and none in the second row, while its two 12V plugs are also consigned to the front. In short, no charging capabilities in the second row. A single 220V plug lives inside the central storage bin
- And image projection from the camera is second-rate, with fish-eye distortion and grainy resolution
5. SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate
- An 8.0-inch touchscreen with crisp resolution and sharp graphics, but is let down by not being equipped with satellite navigation
- Wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto work well, while digital radio is also standard
- Shortcut buttons for accessing menus are welcome, as is the traditional volume dial
- Camera quality is good, too, including a top-down 360-degree surround view
- Loses points for not providing any charging options in the second row with two USB points up front and a single 12V plug, also in the front row
- And the SsangYong’s digital instrument cluster is rich with driving data and information
=2. Mazda BT-50 SP / Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain
- The Mazda and Isuzu twins under the skin share the same infotainment set-up with a 9.0-inch screen with okay resolution and graphics, but certainly not ground-breaking
- Satellite navigation is standard, as is wireless CarPlay and wired Android Auto. Wireless Apple CarPlay did take a little longer than acceptable to connect
- Excellent rear-view camera quality with crisply projected images, although a lack of forward-facing and 360-degree view hurt the twins’ scoring
- Two USB points (one in front and one in the second row) are barely adequate, while points are lost for not being equipped with a 12V plug
- A small driver’s information display, but it packs plenty of punch in terms of information and data
=2. Nissan Navara Pro 4X
- The menu structure housed in the Navara’s 8.0-inch touchscreen responds nicely to touch and swipe inputs
- Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, as is satellite navigation and digital radio
- Shortcut buttons make for an easy user experience, the menu structure intuitive and easy to follow
- Rear-view and 360-degree cameras aren’t the last word in image clarity but certainly better than some in this competitive set. No forward-facing camera, however, costing it points
- There are three USB points, all in the front row, including a single newer USB-C alongside the older USB-A plugs
- The small but serviceable TFT digital driver’s display nestled between analogue dials provides a wealth of trip and driving data
1. Ford Ranger Wildtrak
- The largest screen of this cohort, at 12 inches orientated portrait style, lending it a contemporary air
- Simple menu structure, although a lack physical shortcut buttons cost it some points
- The quality of graphics is excellent, including the images projected from the front- and rear-view cameras, the best picture clarity of this competitive set
- Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, as is satellite navigation and digital radio, although connecting CarPlay wirelessly did prove a little glitchy at times
- A total of five USB points (two USB-A and two UBS-C, one of each front and rear, plus an additional dash cam power USB) are augmented by two 12V plugs
- Digital driver’s display is equally as rich in graphic quality and with a wealth of driving data available
- While not perfect, the Ranger’s infotainment set-up has raised the bar for all those who follow
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Verdict: What is Australia’s Best Dual-cab Ute in 2022?
Numbers don’t lie, and it’s time to crunch the results of this ute Megatest. There are some surprising and not-so-surprising results in this lineup, with some utes carving out strengths in particular disciplines. Let’s get into it.
8. Mitsubishi Triton GSR
The Triton has long been the value pick of the four-wheel-drive ute range. And looking at the numbers here, it still scores very well in terms of cost of ownership. There is the option for a 10-year warranty (provided that owners keep up with dealer servicing), and the combination of a lower entry price and decent resale helps the Triton overall.
And to be honest, the Triton doesn’t perform egregiously bad in any part of this Megatest. While it’s still a solid option, the simple fact is many competitors have moved on in many regards, while other newcomers have muscled in on the Triton’s traditional stomping ground.
Safety technology is lacking, however, and the Triton is now further behind the leaders in terms of ride quality, comfort and overall technology.
The Triton is still a safe and solid choice for those looking for some bang-for-buck, but buyers will need to also consider other options in similar price brackets: a Nissan Navara isn’t far off the Triton in terms of price, but the SsangYong Musso, GWM Ute and LDV T60 (which wasn’t in this test) all undercut the price quotient and need to be considered.
7. Toyota HiLux SR5
Australia’s love for Toyota runs long and deep. And while Australia’s best-selling vehicle for six years in a row shows no sign of slowing down in terms of popularity in 2022, a direct comparison against its segment competitors shows the impact of Toyota’s ageing four-wheel-drive ute platform.
On the more positive side of things, the HiLux was one of the better vehicles for general comfort and driver ergonomics. Ride comfort is decent, and the 2.8-litre powertrain (recently boosted to 150kW/500Nm) felt the most muscular and competent in this company.
Cost of ownership of the HiLux is solid, thanks mostly to a very strong resale value. And the HiLux also proved to be one of the better utes to drive overall. However, a more basic infotainment display and relatively low levels of safety equipment affected the scores of this much loved vehicle noticeably.
The HiLux also proved to be one of the smaller vehicles in this comparison as well, which hurt it in the stakes of overall space in the interior and tub.
6. Nissan Navara Pro-4X
Along with the SsangYong Musso, Nissan’s Navara spurns leaf springs in favour of coils in the back, which has been a major point of difference against the rest of the range.
The chassis’s tuning set-up – now in its fourth tuning iteration since launch in 2014 – feels on the money for a four-wheel-drive ute.
The Navara feels a bit more car-like than other utes in the segment; it’s easy to drive with good levels of comfort and compliance. The powertrain is also solid: smooth, reasonably refined, and offering good levels of punch.
However, the Navara is let down by low levels of ergonomic adjustment on offer, both through the seating position and steering column. Another pointer at the age of the Navara under the skin is the relatively low safety rating, coming fifth out of the eight utes in this comparison.
The Navara scored well for infotainment thanks to recent updates to the 8.0-inch system. It has new technology – including a relatively rare 360-degree camera system – and a good operating system, which is easy to use.
5. GWM Ute Cannon X
The GWM Ute Cannon X is kind of like the Wallabies, who often play a game of two dramatically different halves. On one hand, half of our testing categories saw the Ute score strong podium finishes.
Safety is a particular strong point, with a recent five-star ANCAP safety rating and loads of safety equipment included. There’s good levels of space on offer as well, both inside and in the back.
Cost of ownership, led by a relatively low asking price for this top-spec model, is another strength of the GWM Ute.
However, the GWM fell behind the pace in other sections of testing. The powertrain of the GWM Ute – on paper and in the real world – is least impressive in this comparison, and other driving characteristics like calibration and suspension could use more polish and fine-tuning.
And while the infotainment display in the GMW Ute is a good size, it is let down by a fiddly operating system and some features being omitted.
4. SsangYong Musso XLV Ultimate
Perhaps the most surprising performer of this comparison, the SsangYong Musso impressed the judges in many respects and outranked a handful of more popular and established competitors.
One major strength of the Musso – South Korea’s only four-wheel-drive ute – is its relative size. It was the most spacious overall, and offered good levels of comfort and equipment to boot. And with a relatively low asking price (the lowest in this comparison) and equal-best seven-year warranty, the SsangYong also got an outright win for cost of ownership.
Safety proved to be an Achilles heel for the SsangYong, and mechanical metrics (including a low payload) didn’t help with overall scoring.
While the Musso’s powertrain offers the lowest outputs relative to the vehicle’s weight, performance on-road was decent and had some positives. It was smooth, comfortable, and even a little bit refined.
=2. Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain
The Isuzu D-Max – crown-sharing winner of our most recent Drive Car of the Year for its segment – was always going to be a strong performer in this comparison. It’s one of the newest utes in the comparison in terms of its underlying platform.
Isuzu’s four-wheel-drive ute scored well in the technology stakes, both in terms of infotainment, equipment and safety. The powertrain is a solid and smooth performer, and is well matched by good ride quality in comparison to other utes.
Overall ownership costs aren’t a strong suit for the D-Max, which proved to be its biggest shortcoming.
And while the D-Max level-pegged with the twin-Mazda BT-50, it does score some additional storage and cupholders on the inside, and gets a longer warranty period (but without unlimited kilometres).
=2. Mazda BT-50 SP
The Mazda BT-50, which traded its Ford Ranger bones to use Isuzu’s new ute platform – unsurprisingly level-pegged with its twin-under-the-skin.
Impressive elements of the BT-50 include good ride quality, refinement and driving comfort, and a wide array of standard safety equipment and technology (along with a recent five-star ANCAP safety score).
Mazda’s 9.0-inch infotainment display scored a mid-pack equal-fourth overall, with a good size, lots of features and decent operating system.
The 3.0-litre turbo-diesel engine and six-speed automatic gearbox, both of which are shared exactly with the Isuzu D-Max, are both smooth and offer good performance. There is healthy torque on offer throughout the rev range; however, this powertrain isn’t the most potent in terms of performance.
Like the Isuzu, Mazda’s cost of ownership was a thorn in the side in our ratings. This stems from a relatively high asking price and middling resale value, and saw the BT-50 sit at the bottom of the cost-of-ownership scale (according to our calculations).
1. Ford Ranger Wildtrak
When we first slid behind the wheel of the new-generation Ford Ranger, we knew it was going to make a strong case for winning the Megatest. However, being the most expensive ute in this comparison, winning was far from being a foregone conclusion.
Our Ranger Wildtrak is the only ute available with an optional larger powertrain in this comparison, but our test vehicle went without the more powerful V6 diesel and stuck with the cheaper 2.0-litre BiTurbo four-cylinder engine matched to a 10-speed automatic gearbox and part-time four-wheel-drive system.
Regardless, the new Ford Ranger was quite impressive across the board. It’s the safest ute in this comparison, with the most comprehensive array of equipment backed up by a most recent 2022 five-star ANCAP safety rating.
The Ranger Wildtrak also came out on top in the infotainment stakes, with the 12-inch system offering the most features and best user experience. The interior was comfortable and well appointed, with only the lack of under-thigh adjustment in the driver’s seat attracting criticism.
And although it was the most expensive ute in this comparison, low servicing costs and a strong resale figure saw the Ranger hold strong in the cost-of-ownership department.
Rounding out this all-round impressive performance was a first-place ranking in the driving stakes, with the Ranger scoring well for powertrain performance and refinement, ride quality, steering and seat comfort.
The new Ford Ranger is evidence of further evolution of the once humble four-wheel-drive ute, and it truly feels like a next-generation model. Not only for Ford, but also for the segment overall.
[ Back to the top of the page ]
Multi-car Megatests and single-car reviews
Drive’s Megatest program is a highly analytical, data-driven process that differs to our more experiential road-testing process. As a result, Megatest rankings may differ slightly to the ratings on individual vehicle reviews. Also, our road-testing team spans a variety of life situations – male and female, singles and families, young and older – all of which influences how our reviewers perceive a car’s strengths and weaknesses.
The post Australia’s best ute in 2022 – video Megatest appeared first on Drive.
0 Response to "Australia’s best ute in 2022 – video Megatest"
Post a Comment